On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 9:12 PM, Larrytheliquid <larrytheliq...@gmail.com> wrote: > > This is what I'm thinking, let me explain: http://gist.github.com/41468 > (If you are familiar with RSpec, here is the equivalent RSpec example > http://rspec.info/examples.html)
I really like the look of this so far. Nice work! > Another change is that the "test" macro can take a symbol, a string, or both > as arguments. This allows for more specification/RSpec/BDD-like tests to be > created (I noticed you're experimenting with something similar in > clojure-contrib tests, in the form of test-that). This is exactly the reason that I threw the test-that in there. I was finding it difficult to adequately document the intent of some of the tests I was writing without resorting to extensive comments. The test-that macro, though it doesn't do much now, was intended to be the start of some RSpec-inspired features, but I hadn't put much thought into it yet and it's a good thing because I like where you are going much more. Regards, - J. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
