Rich Hickey a écrit : > The right thing I think is to represent as Integer and Long whenever > possible, and do overflow checking (as is done in the static > add(long,long) etc) rather than pre-op upconversion to next size. This > would require the addition of a LongOps etc. > I see. > I've added an issue for this: > > http://code.google.com/p/clojure/issues/detail?id=22 > > Patch welcome. > I'll give it a try then!
Christophe --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
