I also think this would be a great addition to clojure-contrib. Because of the way most monad tutorials are written, monads seem to be pretty hard to get your head around. Also, many of the reasons for the standard monads in Haskell don't exist in impure functional languages like Clojure. So there's less motivation to understand them. But I found that once I understood them, they are a powerful addition to my conceptual toolbox.
Jim r wrote: > Hi, > > Although I am not a big fan of monads (I can't help the feeling this > abstraction is more difficult than the problem to solve) this starts > looking like a nice framework that should probably go into > clojure-contrib (perhaps with policy of not using this mechanism in > other clojure-contrib libs). --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
