On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 2:53 PM, Rich Hickey <richhic...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Moving syntax-quote out of the reader might be a big deal. But I think > scenarios like this could be covered if: > > ~x not in a syntax-quote yielded the form (unquote x) from the reader > > unquote would not be defined by Clojure, so still an error if allowed > to get evaluated. > > Things like your sql would be macros that handled (unquote x) > internally.
I very much like the sound of this. +1 --Chouser --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
