On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 7:06 PM, Dan Larkin <d...@danlarkin.org> wrote:
> > Yes, I'd like the feature because it's a pain in the neck to go > through and escape strings when I know there's a better way. > > Also sometimes it doesn't feel right to escape strings... for instance > in function doc strings I'd like to give an example return value. But > if the value has to be escaped to play nice with the docstring it can > get confusing confusing... for me at least. I'd like to put *exactly* > what will be returned. > Docstrings are definitely a perfect use-case for triple quoted strings. +1 on including something similar in Clojure. -- Cosmin Stejerean http://www.offbytwo.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
