Rich Hickey schreef:
> I'm not sure Clojure has more built-in reader constructs than Common
> Lisp, which has reader syntax for vectors, arrays, pathnames, dotted
> pairs, bitvectors, read-time evaluation, labels, label references,
> read-time conditionals, many kinds of numbers, functions, balanced
> comments and uninterned symbols, in addition to the usual lists,
> symbols, strings, numbers and characters.

Let's just say that clojuire has more *useful* (as in actually used)
built-in reader constructs than CL.

I'm not complaining (much) - I think most of the clojure constructs
are sound.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to