Rich Hickey schreef: > I'm not sure Clojure has more built-in reader constructs than Common > Lisp, which has reader syntax for vectors, arrays, pathnames, dotted > pairs, bitvectors, read-time evaluation, labels, label references, > read-time conditionals, many kinds of numbers, functions, balanced > comments and uninterned symbols, in addition to the usual lists, > symbols, strings, numbers and characters.
Let's just say that clojuire has more *useful* (as in actually used) built-in reader constructs than CL. I'm not complaining (much) - I think most of the clojure constructs are sound. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
