On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 9:39 AM, Chouser <chou...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 9:15 AM, J. McConnell <jdo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> {:tag :root, :attrs nil, :content [
>> {:tag :fragment, :attrs nil, :content [
>> {:tag :<http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/>:title, :attrs nil,
>> :content ["A HEAD Title"]}
>
> As I mentioned in another thread, keywords can already handle urls as
> namespaces:
>
> user=> (def tag :http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/title)
> #'user/tag
> user=> (namespace tag)
> "http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1";
> user=> (name tag)
> "title"
Thanks, I saw that thread after posting.
> It's a matter of extending clojure.xml to take advantage of this.
This is what I was asking, should clojure.xml be extended in this way.
> I think it's often desirable to also maintain (somewhere) the original
> document's shortcut names, and use those where applicable when
> emitting XML text again.
I agree. Unfortunately, that breaks the equality semantics that some
would expect. Perhaps we could come up with a way to store the
original aliases in metadata, since that's really what they are?
- J.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
