On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 10:42 AM, Rich Hickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Dec 8, 10:08 am, Chouser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> doseq currently supports both. If both appear on the same binding, >> the :while is always test first regardless of the order in which they >> appear in the doseq. The thinking is that if the :while is false, >> there's no need to check the :when. >> >> Is this Good, and should 'for' work the same way? >> > > Yes.
I'll take a look at this tonight, unless someone beats me to it. --Chouser --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
