On Wednesday 03 December 2008 18:28, Stephen C. Gilardi wrote: > On Dec 3, 2008, at 9:15 PM, Randall R Schulz wrote: > > By the way, I do understand while (or) is false and (and) is true, > > but I don't see why = allows a single argument. > > I don't know the answer, but I do see it making sense as the final > value in this sequence: > > (= 1 1 1 ...) > (= 1 1 1) > (= 1 1) > (= 1) > > They all return true and in each case it means "all the arguments > have the same value".
OK, so it's consistent with the null-ary (and) (no argument is false) and (or) (there is a true argument). But from that perspective, shouldn't the definition extend to the null-ary case, too? But I wonder if this doesn't just induce more debugging than is necessary. That was the case for me (if it wasn't apparent). > --Steve Randall Schulz --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
