On Dec 3, 9:01 am, ivant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 3, 3:05 pm, "Rich Hickey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 1:05 AM, Howard Lewis Ship <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > I've created a patch for the clojure source that does the following:
>
> > > - Adds a minimal site build, with links to the main Clojure web site
> > > (http://clojure.org)
> > > - Generates a source JAR to go with the binary JAR
> > > - Generates JavaDoc for the project site (if profile "javadoc" is
> > > enabled)
> > > - Adds a Maven profile, "ci", for a nightly continuous integration
> > > build, to deploy Maven artifacts to a local Maven repository
>
> > > This is based on icky Maven stuff I wrote for Tapestry a year or so ago.
>
> > > I'm also in the process of revamping tapestry.apache.org to make it
> > > more of a project hosting site; it will (soon) have Bamboo (continuous
> > > integration server),
> > > Confluence (Wiki), JIRA (Issue Tracking) and SVN. I could set up a
> > > post-commit and nightly build for Clojure at any time. This has
> > > served the Tapestry community quite well, giving people easy access to
> > > latest-and-greatest snapshots and (JavaDoc) documentation.
>
> > > Note that the clojure-logo.png file must be stored in
> > > src/site/resources/images.
>
> > Interesting, thanks. I'm left wondering about Maven support.
>
> > Maven is not the build system for Clojure, Ant is. Early on, someone who
> > wanted to use maven contributed a pom.xml, but it can get stale.
>
> > Recently, some enhancements made it into build.xml. Are they reflected in
> > this patch?
>
> > Personally, I think the best thing would be to get rid of pom.xml - it just
> > confuses people as to how to build Clojure, which is:
>
> > ant clean
> > ant
>
> > I know people get religious about these build systems, but I just don't have
> > time for it. Clojure is a tiny, simple thing.
>
> > That said, I'd like to hear people's thoughts on how best to have a single
> > build system of record (Ant) and satisfy Maven users?
>
> > Rich
>
> I'm a Maven fan, and I think it'll be good if clojure supports it.
> But "support" here can mean different things. And the minimal
> "support" for maven could be to just drop the clojure.jar in public
> maven repository.
>
> I see just one possible problem with this scenario: ASM, which clojure
> bundles. If somebody adds clojure and a different version of ASM
> things can get hairy. But that's orthogonal to maven/ant decision.
The way Clojure bundles ASM (re-rooting it under clojure) should
preclude conflicts.
Rich
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
