Hi, On 2 Dez., 04:47, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So why is the above form not legal in Clojure? I would think it might > come in handy to define a function that relies on something currently > not-yet-defined. Why is this the appropriate behavior?
As other stated you should use declare to tell Clojure about Vars you will use before they are def'd with a meaningful value. As for the reasons: http://groups.google.com/group/clojure/browse_thread/thread/c3418875208d89e1/adde909f339849c8?lnk=gst&q=declare+%22can%27t+speak+for%22+Rich+Hickey#adde909f339849c8 Sincerely Meikel --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
