On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 3:33 PM, Chouser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 11:50 PM, Stephen C. Gilardi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: >> >> You might also consider these Clojure functions: >> user=> (count "") >> 0 >> user=> (empty? "") >> true > > or (seq "") which returns nil on empty.
I assume (count largecoll) and (empty? largecoll) would be more efficient than (seq largecoll)? -- Michael Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
