> Rich mused about making them macros again at one point to avoid this  
> quoting. Perhaps the convenient use of requre/use/refer/in-ns at the  
> repl is a significantly more important use case than passing their  
> arguments in a way that requires evaluation and we should revisit  
> making the whole suite of them macros.

Hi Steve,

Thanks for the clarification of the history. I am fine with leaving it  
as-is.

Stuart


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to