> Rich mused about making them macros again at one point to avoid this > quoting. Perhaps the convenient use of requre/use/refer/in-ns at the > repl is a significantly more important use case than passing their > arguments in a way that requires evaluation and we should revisit > making the whole suite of them macros.
Hi Steve, Thanks for the clarification of the history. I am fine with leaving it as-is. Stuart --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
