On Nov 20, 2008, at 2:04 PM, Rich Hickey wrote:
> I'm in favor. I'd like to get a single story together incorporating > Stuart's build.xml, his file compiler: > > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure/msg/4f0aa3be9a2dc79d > > and this path suggestion. I've uploaded a patch that works like Stuart's file compiler, but it takes lib names as arguments and compiles them. It's written in Java and works with the patched build.xml to produce a working clojure.jar containing only class files. http://clojure.googlegroups.com/web/build-xml-compile.patch It represents my take on a clean, simple story. The Java part would be slightly simpler if my suggestion for how Clojure allows compile-path to be specified were embedded elsewhere in Clojure, but it's pretty simple as is. It occurred to me that perhaps Repl.java, Script.java and the new Compile.java might be more naturally placed in a new clojure.util package rather than clojure.lang. I'll appreciate hearing Stuart's and your thoughts about whether this is sufficient or if it needs work and whether or not we also need a file compiler. --Steve --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
