On Nov 14, 2008, at 3:11 PM, Howard Lewis Ship wrote: > The point is, an exception that said something like: > > "Expected java.lang.Comparable but received :king" would have helped > me unravel this much, much easier!
I agree. Clojure should give all the information it can about the object(s) involved in the failure. There are other places where the class of the object is given, but not its string representation. Any juicy info that's easily available should be made part of the exception message. --Steve --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
