Hi folks, I haven't been bitten by the "do not use" revisions, R1089 onward, but it seems that others have.
I'm just curious why the team decided not to use a branch for these breaking changes, and merging back with trunk once the breakage was finished? Like many open-source projects, Clojure seems to have a HEAD culture rather than a Release culture, so intentionally breaking HEAD should be taboo, IMHO. Best, Graham --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
