On Thu, 2008-10-30 at 01:37 -0700, mb wrote: > I lookep up the implementation of proxy-super. It replaces the > method temporarily. So proxy-super basically doesn't work for > methods with multiple implementations for different arglists, > since only the actually called method-arglist combination is > then in effect. I think it throws the Exception because now, > the first implementation is missing and it is abstract in the > superclass.
Yes, after I looked into proxy-super I came to the the same conclusion. I wonder though what can be done about this limitation of the proxy approach, as according to the documentation of proxy, access to super can not be proxied. What a pity. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
