Hi, > But assume I wanto to provide two implementations for such an > interface, in two separate namespaces.
Personally, I'd define multimethods as the “interface“, in a single namespace, and implement them for any set of data structures that I wanted to support. At least, this is the CLOS way, so to speak (CLOS = the Common Lisp Object System). Which, by the way, means that when you say, > In standard Lisps, everything would be represented by cons nodes, with > little to no abstraction you're wrong. Thank God! :) (Note: As I'm not yet very familiar with idiomatic Clojure style and (at least for the time being) much more of a Common Lisper, I'd suggest sticking to what the others say if in any doubt. My posting is to be read merely as a hint, not as a recommendation.) Matthias --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
