On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 11:13 AM, J. McConnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I like "with", that's what JavaScript uses IIRC.
I think JavaScript's "with" means something slightly different. I don't remember about Ruby. But as Stephen pointed out, this is only useful when the methods (or functions) have side-effects -- their return values are thrown away. This explains the use of "do" in the original name, and is a good reason to keep "do" in the new name. I don't see much wrong with "doto->", though "do-with" or "do->" might be okay. I'd probably vote against "do-unto-others-as" --Chouser --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
