Hi, On 16 Okt., 05:13, Timothy Pratley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Just a few follow on questions... > 1) Is there any way to do away with the input bindings altogether? map > doesn't need input bindings, but memfn does. I don't quite grasp why > they are needed for memfn, or how to construct an input binding based > on the number of collections. ie: I would need to generate a list of > symbols the size of the number of collections (map gensym colls) ???? > I know that code wont work, but there must be a way.
Maybe you find this helpful: http://paste.lisp.org/display/67182 (map #(jcall "Timothy" 'substring %1 %2) (iterate inc 0) [3 4 5]) Please note, that the annotation does not allow variadic application while jcall does. It's trivial to cut arguments, eg. #(jcall obj 'method %1 fixed-arg %2 another-fixed %&) Sincerely Meikel --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
