Ah, thanks -- it was the ability of the symbol call to generate a new sym from a string that I was missing.
On Oct 16, 2:03 pm, Asbjørn Bjørnstad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Why would it be? Code generation is a ideological yes-yes > in lisps. No idea. I was just vaguely aware of Strong Opinions floating around on topics such as this. The code I indicated has nothing to do with what I'm actually looking at. Thanks Tom --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---