Apologies Colin... I'll just say I was a victim of Trolltech marketing, that wasn't the impression I got.
2008/10/11 Colin Walters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > On Oct 10, 4:42 pm, "Ande Turner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > David, > > Thank you very much for such an expansive response. Currently a > thread-safe > > Swing alternative is using the Jambi bindings for Qt. I neglected to > provide > > Hmm? Qt isn't really any more threadsafe than Swing is, or than GTK+ > is: > > http://doc.trolltech.com/4.0/threads.html : > "Although QObject is reentrant, the GUI classes, notably QWidget and > all its subclasses, are not reentrant. They can only be used from the > main thread." > > GUI programs by their very nature have a large amount of state, and > the object-oriented paradigm makes a lot of sense. So back to the > original question - probably what makes the most sense with Clojure is > to write nontrivial GUI components in Java, and the interact with your > GUI code via Clojure's Java integration. > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
