On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 4:07 AM, Christophe Grand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello Chouser, (btw, nice work you are doing with ClojureScript)
Thanks -- good to see you around again! > Do you plan to support printing of all Pattern instances or only those > created using the new literal syntax? In the first case, the story gets > more complex with \Q, \E and flags. In the second case, that's fine. I think I need to support all Patterns, and you're right I haven't thought sufficiently about \Q and \E. Interestingly, I don't think there's any way to get a plain double-quote into a regex after a \Q under the proposal. I don't *think* that's a problem, as you're most likely to use \Q when building a pattern programmatically, and if you're not you can drop out of \Q mode to get your " in there. If anyone disagrees with this conclusion, speak up! Of course that means I need to do this for you when printing... --Chouser --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
