For your specific case you should probably be using contains?, which works for both.
But I agree it seems odd. > > The following looks weird to me: > > Clojure > user=> (.contains [1 2 3] 2) > true > user=> (true? (.contains [1 2 3] 2)) > false > > AFAICS true? is implemented using identical? which tests by reference > equality. Now since Java boolean values are boxed into Booleans we > have > not only Boolean.TRUE. Maybe true? (and false?) should be > implemented in > terms of equals? > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
