On Sep 20, 2008, at 7:27 PM, Mike Hinchey wrote: > I added support for *1 *2 *3 in my fork of swank-clojure (for emacs/ > slime), http://github.com/mikehinchey/swank-clojure.
I'm glad to see this support in swank-clojure. Thanks! > I did one thing different which is to not reset the vars if the eval > is one of the vars themselves. Rich noted most CL repls don't do > this, but it seems useful to me. Thoughts? I think it's good idea. It does seem a shame to lose one of these values as a result of looking at one. I had considered it, but didn't see how to implement it reasonably. Having been shown the way on that (thanks!) I'm in favor. Other thoughts? --Steve --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
