Yes, the name and semantics of aspects fits for it more. I like that. I am going to sign up for contributing soon.
I am low on time currently, so feel free to extend this idea further. As soon as Rich gets agreement, you can use it :-) Frantisek --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
