On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 1:41 PM, Allen Rohner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Another option would be to give a different name to the new function,
> and deprecate doseq at some point in the future. Clojure is still
> fairly new, and I'd hate to see these kinds of things solidify too
> early.
A new name -- like dofor?
(defmacro dofor [& body]
`(dorun (for [EMAIL PROTECTED])))
Then instead of (doseq i (range 10) (println i)
you can instead say (dofor [i (range 10)] (println i)
...plus you could do:
(dofor [i (range 1 9)
j (range 1 9)
:when (= 0 (rem i j))]
(println i j)
--Chouser
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
