On Mon, 25 Nov 2024 22:34:46 GMT, Jeremy <d...@openjdk.org> wrote: >> The AWTEventMulticaster is a tree node with 2 children. This PR proposes >> rebalancing that tree after 500 additions to avoid potential >> StackOverflowErrors when trying to interact with a large AWTEventMulticaster. >> >> In the original headful test: >> We added 8,000 checkboxes, and when their parent panel was hidden the stack >> needed to grow to 24,000 lines. It took 8,000 lines to recursively call >> `java.awt.AWTEventMulticaster.componentHidden`, and then 16,000 additional >> lines to call two recursive methods to remove a listener: >> >> java.desktop/java.awt.AWTEventMulticaster.removeInternal() >> java.desktop/java.awt.AWTEventMulticaster.remove() >> >> >> With this current PR the max stack size reaches 1,267 instead. (If we >> rebalanced at EVERY addition, then that same scenario would reach a max >> stack size of 71.) >> >> JDK-8342782 included a headful test case, but I think the main problem it >> demonstrated can be represented by the headless test case attached to this >> PR. >> >> Depending on how this PR is received I may submit a separate ticket & PR to >> modify AquaButtonUI so it doesn't always attach an AncestorListener. (That >> is: if my GUI includes 8,000 checkboxes then I don't need 8,000 >> AncestorListeners.) But JDK-8342782's test case is currently written in a >> way that should reproduce across all L&F's, so that can be discussed >> separately. > > Jeremy has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit > since the last revision: > > 8342782: expanding wildcard imports > > This is in response to: > https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/21962#discussion_r1857389973
@azvegint @honkar-jdk @prsadhuk @TejeshR13 could one of you be the 2nd reviewer for this please. ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/21962#issuecomment-2518355626
