On Sat, 31 Jul 2021 02:37:53 +0000 "Joel Esler (jesler)" <jes...@cisco.com> wrote:
> > On Jul 30, 2021, at 14:41, Paul Kosinski via clamav-users > > <clamav-users@lists.clamav.net> wrote: > > > > (I don't see exactly how a LTS would have helped with the bandwidth issue, > > but I suppose it wouldn't have made it any more disruptive.) > > 103.2 and 103.3 are much more respectful to bandwidth than any past version. > We’ve been working with Cloudflare on the development of a feature that is > exactly optimized to handle these changes, and they are almost ready to > deploy it. We’ve tested it out and it works well, so we’re just waiting on a > few more updates. > What I meant was that if (e.g.) 0.103.1 had been LTS, that alone wouldn't have solved the bandwidth overload. Making (e.g.) 0.104.x LTS will (of course) mitigate future bandwidth problems. _______________________________________________ clamav-users mailing list clamav-users@lists.clamav.net https://lists.clamav.net/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml
