Looks like "BC.Gif.Exploit-1425366" finally did the trick.  Thanks.  Is this
kind of thing documented anywhere?

On 7/21/21 12:33 PM, eric-l...@truenet.com wrote:
> Orion,
> 
> Did you keep .Agent at the end of the whitelist?
> It should just be BC.Gif.Exploit.Agent-1425366.
> 
> I scanned the tar balls at gnome.org and didn't find anything though, but 
> maybe you got it from somewhere else.
> 
> Sincerely,
> 
> Eric Tykwinski
> TrueNet, Inc.
> P: 610-429-8300
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: clamav-users <clamav-users-boun...@lists.clamav.net> On Behalf Of Orion 
> Poplawski via clamav-users
> Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2021 1:48 PM
> To: ClamAV users ML <clamav-users@lists.clamav.net>
> Cc: Orion Poplawski <or...@nwra.com>
> Subject: [clamav-users] Cannot ignore BC.Gif.Exploit.Agent-1425366.Agent
> 
> clamav is reporting BC.Gif.Exploit.Agent-1425366.Agent for a gif inside of the
> gdk-pixbuf2 tarball.  I've tried adding it do our local whitelist.ign2 file, 
> but that doesn't appear to take effect.  Any way to ignore this definition?
> 
> Thanks,
>   Orion
> 
> --
> Orion Poplawski
> IT Systems Manager                         720-772-5637
> NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office             FAX: 303-415-9702
> 3380 Mitchell Lane                       or...@nwra.com
> Boulder, CO 80301                 https://www.nwra.com/
> 
> 
> 


-- 
Orion Poplawski
IT Systems Manager                         720-772-5637
NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office             FAX: 303-415-9702
3380 Mitchell Lane                       or...@nwra.com
Boulder, CO 80301                 https://www.nwra.com/

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

_______________________________________________

clamav-users mailing list
clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
https://lists.clamav.net/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users


Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide:
https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq

http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml

Reply via email to