> On Wed, 30 Sep 2020 5:12 AM, G.W. Haywood via clamav-users wrote: > On Wed, 30 Sep 2020, Carlos André via clamav-users wrote: > > Maybe I missed some configuration in /etc/clamd.d/scan.conf that > > enables that information. > > I've never personally seen a file called 'scan.conf' on any system with ClamAV > installed on it. You don't get one if you install from the source as > distributed > by Cisco/Talos on the ClamAV Website, so I know that you must have installed > from some distribution's package or other. Perhaps you can tell us a little > more about your system and about how you obtained ClamAV, and - perhaps > more importantly - why.
I think " /etc/clamd.d/scan.conf " is Fedora's equivalent of clamd.conf. It's obnoxious that they've gone and renamed it, but it should function the same. For Carlos: No there's no option to make the clamdscan summary match the clamscan summary. ClamDscan gets scan results from ClamD over a socket and a public protocol. Clamscan on the other hand has all the data readily available so it's much easier to add summary info to Clamscan than ClamDscan. The protocol used to communicate with ClamD also has to be stable because there are 3rd-party programs which interact with ClamD. For this reason, Clamscan has more info in the summary. It would certainly be nice to have the outputs match, but I'm not sure how easy that will be without breaking the API. Then again, I’m really not that familiar with the protocol. It might not be too bad. Anyways, TL;DR is that yes ClamDscan has less detail in the summary, and no - there's not much to be done about it at present. -Micah _______________________________________________ clamav-users mailing list clamav-users@lists.clamav.net https://lists.clamav.net/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml
