Hi there, On Tue, 31 Jul 2018, Steve Basford wrote:
My little issue is with this statement: "It wasn't quite clear at the offset of this bug, but ClamAV cannot support unofficial signatures from a development standpoint. For numerous reasons, we do not regress against those signatures, and in cases where sig writers publish non-functional signatures due to insufficient testing (which then cause crashes in newer versions of clam) we cannot devote our resources to fixing that problem." (above Bugzilla)
I'll take issue with that statement too. That's a cr@p developer attitude. If an unofficial signature causes (or is even _capable_ of causing) clam to crash, that's a fault in clam that needs to be fixed. If nothing else it means that you're quite likely less secure if you're running clam on Linux than you are if you're _not_ running it. -- 73, Ged. _______________________________________________ clamav-users mailing list clamav-users@lists.clamav.net http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml
