> Am 17.07.2018 um 15:47 schrieb Micah Snyder (micasnyd) <micas...@cisco.com>: > > You're making an assumption that the LLVM 3.7-3.9 patches are ready-to-take.
Debian seems to use it since a while on all its stable and unstable branches... > Last time I worked with them I had some issues with the patches on systems > other than Debian. OK. And why not ironed out the concerning glichtes or given them a priority to iron that out? > At the time, we were attempting to wrap up a _very_ long development cycle > with final bug fixes and regression testing. We decided it was more > important to get the release out. The LLVM patches were pushed to the next > release (aka 0.101). OK > For reference, our Bugzilla ticket to apply the LLVM 3.7, 3.8, 3.9 patches is > here. Please bare in mind if you read the ticket that our product versioning > changed. Our previous lead didn't recognize a need for security/patch > releases. 0.99.3 and 0.99.4 ended up being security patch releases. In the > ticket, "0.99.3" refers to 0.100, and "0.99.4" refers to 0.101: > https://bugzilla.clamav.net/show_bug.cgi?id=11869 I know. I am already CC’d to this ticket, which also is provided with LLVM 3.7/3.8/3.9-patches since 2017-07-07 by Sebastian A. Siewior, which unfortunately so far didn’t make it into the upstream sources. Regards, Sierk Bornemann _______________________________________________ clamav-users mailing list clamav-users@lists.clamav.net http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml
