Basically in terms of the signatures people provide, even though you can get the information of what they thought was malicious from the sigtool, it would be really nice if there was at least an option for people to also provide descriptions of *why* they thought it was malicious. So that it is easier to tell if it's actually so and also to deal with all the damage in case in is unclear all that it did. If an option like this was provided then it would be really great if users were encouraged to do so. It is so with all other AVs. It's really unhelpful for Clam to give such little information on "malware" it finds. It might not even be actually a malicious file.
On Sat, 30 Jun 2018 at 00:31, Joel Esler (jesler) <jes...@cisco.com> wrote: > Who needs to add a link to what, and what would you like to see? > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On Jun 29, 2018, at 19:11, Nikita Yerenkov-Scott < > yerenkov.sc...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Is there any chance that they will add a way of people giving a > > description of why they think that it is malware? > _______________________________________________ > clamav-users mailing list > clamav-users@lists.clamav.net > http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users > > > Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: > https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq > > http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml > -- The world is filled with Totoros.
_______________________________________________ clamav-users mailing list clamav-users@lists.clamav.net http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml
