Hi, On 20/06/18 02:45, G.W. Haywood wrote: > On Tue, 19 Jun 2018, Andrew McGlashan wrote: > >> ... The clamav SPF record also doesn't have an "all" value, which >> should be the last entry for each record. ... > > There is an implicit '?all' mechanism for any SPF record which does > not have one explicitly set by the record author or by the content of > a 'redirect' modifier - see section 4.7 of RFC7208 (but I'd agree that > it's better to state a policy explicitly).
Okay. >> ... many SPF records are just plain wrong, or how many have more >> than 1 entry (having only 1 is valid, more than 1 is a fail) ... > > More than 1 gives 'permerror', not 'fail' (see section 4.5), although > I suppose you may choose to treat the two results identically. :) Sure, but when I wrote fail, I actually meant "doing it wrong, as in failing to get the setup right"; yes it is permerror. ;-) A. _______________________________________________ clamav-users mailing list clamav-users@lists.clamav.net http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml
