On Fri, 26 Jan 2018, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > On 26.01.18 13:09, Kees Theunissen wrote: >> On Fri, 26 Jan 2018, Al Varnell wrote: >> >>> If you can't revert to daily 24255 then disable daily.cld until you know >>> it's >>> fixed. >>> >>> Has anybody updated to daily 24257 to see if that helps? I doubt that it >>> does >>> as no sigs are shown as dropped. >> >> I'm running ClamAv 0.99.2 on two mail servers (debian 9, with >> sendmail / MimeDefang / SpamAssassing /ClamAv) and a >> workstation (slackware 14.2) without any problem. >> >> I'm currently running daily 24257. But 24256 ran without >> problems too. > > I've had to start clamd on 3 of servers I looked at, some other were OK.
I didn't see any problems on my two (very lightly-loaded, about 2.5 messages per minute on average) servers. But I could reproduce the stale fd's in /prod/<PID_of_clamd>/fd on my workstation by increasing the load on clamd. Just scanning inbound mail on the workstaion didn't trigger the error. But scanning a few hundred (clean, text-only) email messages from this mailing lingst did. cat ~/mail/clamav | formail -s clamdscan - I didn't try to trigger the error on the two production servers. Regards, Kees Theunissen. -- Kees Theunissen, System and network manager, Tel: +31 (0)40-3334724 Dutch Institute For Fundamental Energy Research (DIFFER) email address: c.j.theunis...@differ.nl postal address: PO Box 6336, 5600 HH, Eindhoven, the Netherlands visitors address: De Zaale 20, 5612 AJ, Eindhoven, the Netherlands _______________________________________________ clamav-users mailing list clamav-users@lists.clamav.net http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml
