I'm struggling to understand how that would improve the DB? It's not a security issue and it would seemingly involve a ton of work to run all those samples again just to get a larger number which would require additional time to download and space to store the DB as well as in RAM.
-Al- On Fri, Sep 08, 2017 at 04:12 AM, Vijayakumar U wrote: > Dear Team, > > Do we have any plans to maintain/update the signature DB with sha256sum? > > Is there any specific reason to maintain the signatures in md5sum format? > > Please clarify.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ clamav-users mailing list clamav-users@lists.clamav.net http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml
