As well as mail scanning, we use CLAMAV with HAVP for HTTP scanning. Although HAVP is not currently being developed, it seems to work OK.
P.S. HAVP uses the CLAMAV library directly to do the scanning, rather than CLAMD or (worse) CLAMSCAN. On Tue, 13 Jun 2017 09:37:36 +0000 Paul Moreno <p...@paulmoreno.net> wrote: > Hi All, > > > I'm in the process of providing a recommendation to a client on the > use of ClamAV. From what I've read in various forums and online > material, ClamAV appears to be better suited for mail systems, such > as postfix, and Windows hosts. Can anyone comment on the reliability > and accuracy of using it on a Linux operating system? I understand > Linux "malware" would more or less be in the form of custom scripts, > library exploits, and other vulnerabilities that lack signatures to > detect against. > > > -Paul > _______________________________________________ > clamav-users mailing list > clamav-users@lists.clamav.net > http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users > > > Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: > https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq > > http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml > > _______________________________________________ clamav-users mailing list clamav-users@lists.clamav.net http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml
