crazy thinker skrev den 2017-05-04 13:39:
Sanesecurity signatures : *97.11%*
SecuriteInfo signatures (free) : 19.03%
ClamAV Official only signatures: 13.82%
all this is not virus signature, so for me this does not count
Number of signatures:
Sanesecurity signatures : *249,766*
SecuriteInfo (free) : 1,110,596
ClamAV Only : 4,137,929
if clamav should have more optimized signatures, if would need more
virus signatures, not just random more signatures
personly i like to see more 0day signaturees then 10000 more specific
signature catches
Date of oldest malware Sample in test : 06.01.2015
Date of newest malware Sample in test: 05.12.2015
so thay are dead ?
Optimized Database means the db having leass no of signatures and can
able
to give more malware detection rate
so no more 3dr party signature ?
and now i ask why is clamwin have more signatures engines then clamav
linux ?, reading this maillists here says we all want clamav to be
global not just windows specific, ironical ?
_______________________________________________
clamav-users mailing list
clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide:
https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq
http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml
