Am 14.04.2017 um 18:33 schrieb crazy thinker:
Oh.. ok..But how Commercial AV Calculating risk level of malware and
what is the criteria for that.?
frankly i don't want to know at all what nonsense criteria all that
ratware which is most of the time more security risk and malware itself
and i assure you they just throw a coin to create another blinky shiny
thing on their UI
On 14 April 2017 at 22:00, Reindl Harald <h.rei...@thelounge.net> wrote:
Am 14.04.2017 um 18:28 schrieb crazy thinker:
All Commericial AV's showign risk status of malware
SanSecurity creating signature database files based and it showing risk
status of malware
sanesecurity shows *risk of false-positives*
don't confuse such basics
On 14 April 2017 at 21:17, SCOTT PACKARD <scott.pack...@raytheon.com>
wrote:
No. all malware would not be large risk.. for an example, EICAR test
file
is sample virus file.it can't make big damage to system.
Can you present another example, other than the EICAR test file?
_______________________________________________
clamav-users mailing list
clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide:
https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq
http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml
