Hi there,

On Thu, 2 Mar 2017, Bowie Bailey wrote:

... Hate to say it, but you downloaded the wrong files. ...

At the risk of stating the obvious, I downloaded the links that the OP
gave in his post.  As I said, they're HTMLified garbage.  As I also
said, tools are available to deal easily with mail headers if they're
causing problems.

But, more importantly, this is all about ClamAV failing to find ONE
malicious message sent via Hotmail.  The discussion would make a lot
more sense if (a) malicious messages didn't outnumber the other kind
by a factor of something like twenty, and (b) ClamAV (even if it could
reliably find the body in a Hotmail-delivered message) were not, as a
virus scanner, next to useless.  Incidentally other contributors to
this list have made similar points, and one said fairly recently that
ClamAV couldn't find water in the ocean although I think that's rather
harsh.  In case you're wondering, I use ClamAV because it can use the
excellent signatures maintained by Steve Basford at Sanesecurity to
fight spam.  Without them I would have no use for ClamAV.

I reject everything from Hotmail (and Yahoo, Comcast, RR, Gmail and a
couple of dozen other fairly big 'free' email providers) because that
is much more effective and much less demanding on CPU+RAM than trying
to sift out the 0.5% of half-way genuine mail from those sources using
a tool like ClamAV.  Botnets are a much bigger source; my milters spot
them within a few milliseconds of their establishing a connection, and
tarpit them immediately - for anything up to a few years, it depends -
without any help from ClamAV, which is incapable of detecting them.

As a commercial provider the OP might not feel that he can afford the
luxury of rejecting mail from all the freebie providers, and he quite
likely has to rely on Spamhaus et al to drop botnet connections which
is a bit hit and miss at the best of times, but in my view the world
(or at least his customers) would be safer if he put his effort into
something that's capable of yielding better results.

Either way, despite the initial reaction, I don't want to see somebody
go up a blind alley if a little thought will give far more reward with
much less perspiration, wafer fabrication and electricity consumption.

--

73,
Ged.
_______________________________________________
clamav-users mailing list
clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users


Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide:
https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq

http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml

Reply via email to