Alex wrote: > Please don't send me to the amavis list - there must be someone who > uses both clamav and amavis that understands what's happening here.
Much like SpamAssassin, Clamav in and of itself can only say "Matched signature <foo>" or "Triggered heuristic test <bar>", or "Didn't match anything". It's up to whatever is calling Clam to decide what to do with that result. Many common integration methods for both are simple enough that they don't have any way of postprocessing the result from SA or Clam (and therefore treat those results as go/no-go flags), but AFAIK amavis should be able to give you more flexibility - something best asked about on the amavis users list. -kgd _______________________________________________ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml
