On Jul 19, 2016, at 1:09 PM, Reindl Harald <h.rei...@thelounge.net> wrote: >> False. Assuming that there is only one correct mail architecture is a major >> fallacy. > > bla - yes there are more ways but your whole stuff about SPF was entirely > wrong from the very begin in case of the messages in question
You managed to misinterpet what I actually said, and are now off in the weeds. Have fun with that strawman. >> If a mail server sends outbound, it needs to be willing to handle bounces >> and DSNs for those messages/domains which it sends. > > bullshit - the MX does and this servers outbound mail was *not* for a domain > below it's own hostname and so it has no business for inbound mail That, and you are inexcusably rude to people who were trying to help you. Good day, sir. I hope your customers find better service elsewhere. Regards, -- -Chuck _______________________________________________ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml
