Hello Joel, > You're right. Nothing I said was negative. We know exactly what happens > when our testing is done. We don't know in other cases. I didn't say > anything about the quality of 3rd party signatures. In fact, the quality > is so good, that's exactly why we are rolling out the program to protect > more people.
I have couple of signatures, handmade, I submited to community-sigs. And I have *no news* from them. Did they pass false positive tests ? Are they wrong ? Will they be published one day ? Do Clamav want better detection ratio ? If yes, the minimum is to provide news for sigmakers that sumbit their signatures (time and efforts) to community-sigs to be included in official Clamav databases. > Protecting customers is a good thing. We're always going to try and do > that. We (third parties) do that too ;) -- Best regards, Arnaud Jacques SecuriteInfo.com Facebook : https://www.facebook.com/pages/SecuriteInfocom/132872523492286 Twitter : @SecuriteInfoCom _______________________________________________ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml
