My impression has long been that the majority of signatures are not e-mail content or attachment related.
Sent from Janet's iPad -Al- On Mar 30, 2016, at 2:27 PM, "C.D. Cochrane" <c...@post.com> wrote: > It just appears from reading this list that any FP on a non-standard use of > the product (not email attachment) gets a high priority among the ClamAV > team. One would think that non-standard FPs would be pushed way down on the > to-do list. If they are getting 1 million virus reports per day, then fixing > a false positive on a downloaded distribution should take a few weeks to get > to. > >>> Still, people have choices and they can do what they want. Whilst there >>> is the option, and a belief that an AV solution should be effective, >>> then naturally people will expect it and report their FP's. (And who >>> can blame them). > _______________________________________________ > Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: > https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq > > http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml _______________________________________________ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml