Hi, On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 1:57 PM, Joel Esler (jesler) <jes...@cisco.com> wrote: > Gentlemen. We get the point. We’re working on it. I had a conversation > with the malware lead > last week to see what we can do here.
Can you help with my original question about: clamd server '/var/run/clamd.amavisd/clamd.sock' gave '' response Is this expected, when clamav-notify-servers is run while clamd is re-reading the databases? Can someone tell me if this happens on their system too? It was a bug a long time ago, but thought it was fixed. It's just started again. > On Feb 22, 2016, at 12:06 PM, Groach > <groachmail-stopspammin...@yahoo.com<mailto:groachmail-stopspammin...@yahoo.com>> > wrote: > > I dont think there is any 'cause' to be had (that the unofficial signatures > found threats and that the official ones didnt) other than ClamAV signatures > are too few, too ineffective and more importantly too late. I never saw this message. Was this posted to the list? I've found the sanesecurity rules to work well. The securiteinfo rules are horrible. I'd never expect to only use the default clamav rules. Thanks, Alex _______________________________________________ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml
