My experience with these kind of failures is that the pattern is not properly anchored or the writer doesn't understand greedy grep patterns or both. Fallout from the new pcregrep, perhaps? I've not analyzed it so am speculating here, but lessons learned after decades of doing this is of regex results amaze you then you have probably screwed up somewhere when writing the pattern. Or as one of my staff liked to say, something we're sure of is wrong.

dp

On 2/16/16 7:02 PM, Al Varnell wrote:
Resubmited.

87084602bb62d9213e10a1741150093a37481cd005b62008e7187f2086b8922a:319649:pg3726-images.epub

-Al-

On Feb 14, 2016, at 4:34 PM, Al Varnell <alvarn...@mac.com> wrote:

I attempted to submit the sample I have to http://www.clamav.net/reports/fp and it was 
similarly rejected as "empty."  Scanned the file on my computer after updating 
definitions still shows it as infected.  Uploading it to VirusTotal results in only a 
ClamAV detection:
<https://www.virustotal.com/en/file/87084602bb62d9213e10a1741150093a37481cd005b62008e7187f2086b8922a/analysis/1455495993/>.


_______________________________________________
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide:
https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq

http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml

_______________________________________________
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide:
https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq

http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml

Reply via email to