On Feb 12, 2016, at 8:22 AM, Gene Heskett <ghesk...@wdtv.com> wrote: > So this is a feature request: > > When clamdscan is used to filter an incoming email, it will find the > From: or Reply To: lines, possibly before it finds a reason to cause > that mail to be dumped. > > So, how much trouble would it be to clear a buffer for each of those 2 > header lines, with a Reply-To: taking precedence, and if something is > found, output the last From: or Reply-to: information at the same time > it logs the FOUND msg?
What you're asking for is the responsibility of your mail scanning software. clamdscan doesn't filter email. In fact, usually clamdscan isn't provided the mail envelope headers to scan at all, just the body or even just the MIME attachments after the email body has been decoded and unpacked. (If you're rolling your own mail scanner via procmail, well, look at the exit status of clamdscam and output the headers you want to see. But things like amavisd already do good job of interfacing between the MTA and virus scanners.) Regards, -- -Chuck _______________________________________________ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml
