Write a local whitelist record?
dp
On 11/18/15 11:32 PM, Al Varnell wrote:
I just submitted my FP to them 48 hours ago and have not received confirmation
on it’s acceptance yet. Not terribly unusual, but given that it impacts Adobe
apps, I did expect to have some feedback by now.
-Al-
On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 10:07 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
/home/gene/.cache/chromium/Default/Cache/f_000445:
Swf.Exploit.CVE_2015_5548 FOUND
/home/gene/.cache/chromium/Default/Cache/f_000031:
Swf.Exploit.CVE_2015_5548 FOUND
/home/gene/.cache/chromium/Default/Cache/f_000200:
Swf.Exploit.CVE_2015_5548 FOUND
/home/gene/.cache/chromium/Default/Cache/f_0001fb:
Swf.Exploit.CVE_2015_5548 FOUND
/home/gene/.cache/chromium/Default/Cache/f_000202:
Swf.Exploit.CVE_2015_5548 FOUND
A sudo freshclam says everything is up to date.
gene@coyote:~$ sudo freshclam
[sudo] password for gene:
ClamAV update process started at Thu Nov 19 01:01:56 2015
main.cvd is up to date (version: 55, sigs: 2424225, f-level: 60, builder:
neo)
daily.cld is up to date (version: 21069, sigs: 1691987, f-level: 63,
builder: neo)
bytecode.cld is up to date (version: 270, sigs: 46, f-level: 63, builder:
shurley)
Should this not be fixed by now, or is it real? Since its in the browser
cache, I am just nuking them.
Debian wheezy here, up to date as of about 2 hours ago.
Cheers, Gene Heskett
_______________________________________________
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide:
https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq
http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml
_______________________________________________
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide:
https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq
http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml
