Scott Kitterman <deb...@kitterman.com> wrote: >> Given that I wouldn't be bothered at all if SystemD was "just" an init >> system, it's all the other crap I want to keep out. Do you really think >> I'm going to allow a SystemD library (who's package description gives >> no clues about it's functions or intentions) onboard ? > > That strikes me as more than a little over cautious, but it's your system, so > meh.
Since the more I find out about SystemD, the more I dislike it (I nearly wrote the less I like it, but that would imply something completely different), I don't think it's overly cautious. It's description says "systemd utility library", but then says "The libsystemd0 library provides interfaces to various systemd components" - so which is it, "stuff" (as implied by the first bit) or "interfaces to stuff" (as implied by the second bit) ? Given that "stuff" in this case is something I actively want to be nowhere near my systems, I hope any reasonable person could see why I'm not prepared to "install and not worry about". NB - It won't start without the library present. Since SystemD is *supposed* to be optional, I'll raise a bug report. _______________________________________________ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml
